Written by 
Lie detector tests, formally called polygraph tests, have long been a fascination and controversy topic. Movies and television shows are often filled with their infallible role in detecting deception. But do they really work? This article delves into the myths and facts surrounding the lie detector test accuracy and whether they should be trusted at all.
A) Knowing How Lie Detector Tests Work:
Before evaluating their accuracy, it’s important to understand how lie detector tests work. A polygraph measures physiological responses such as:
i) Heart rate.
ii) Blood pressure.
iii) Respiration.
iv) Skin conductivity (sweat).
The premise is simple: when a person tells a lie, he or she feels stress or anxiety, which will trigger measurable changes in these physiological parameters. A polygraph examiner asks a series of baseline and relevant questions to detect inconsistencies in the responses. This method is far from foolproof.
B) Myth 1: Lie Detector Tests Are 100% Accurate:
One of the most common misconceptions is that lie detector tests are completely accurate. While they can provide valuable insights, their reliability is not absolute. Studies have shown that polygraph tests are accurate about 70% to 90% of the time under controlled conditions. This leaves a significant margin of error.
Several factors influence the accuracy of a polygraph test:
i) The Expertise of the Examiner:
An expert examiner can better interpret results, whereas an inexperienced one might misinterpret physiological responses.
ii) The State of the Subject:
Nervousness, anxiety, or even a medical condition may influence the test results even if the subject is truthful.
iii) Test Conditions:
Tests conducted in poor conditions or unclear questions may yield wrong results.
C) Myth 2: Only Guilty People Fail Polygraph Tests:
Another popular myth is that only guilty people flunk a polygraph test. The truth is that innocent people can flunk because of stress, fear of being misunderstood, or even high blood pressure due to medical conditions. On the other hand, guilty people can pass by using countermeasures like controlled breathing or mental distractions to alter their physiological responses.
D) Myth: Polygraphs Are Admissible in All Courts:
The accuracy level of the test is questionable, and so lie detector tests are not accepted as evidence in courts. In the United States, the admissibility of polygraph results varies from state to state. Some courts allow them with strict conditions, while others outright reject them. This inconsistency reflects the skepticism of the legal community regarding such reliability.
E) Myth 3: They can detect lies directly:
Popularly, polygraphs are known not to detect lies but instead measure physiological changes that may reflect stress or anxiety. It is assumed that the changes occur as a result of lying, but this is not the case, as other causes can produce similar results. For instance, someone may experience heightened anxiety discussing a traumatic event regardless of his honesty.
F) Fact: Polygraphs Are Useful in Investigations:
Despite their limitations, polygraphs are a valuable tool for investigation. They are commonly applied in the following:
i) Pre-employment screenings:
Mainly in sensitive roles such as law enforcement or intelligence agencies.
ii) Criminal investigations:
To verify or discredit the statements of suspects.
iii) Security clearances:
For assessing trustworthiness.
However, investigators usually consider polygraph results together with other evidence rather than using them to prove guilt or innocence.
G) Role of Bias in Polygraph Testing:
Bias is a significant influencer of the outcome of a lie detector test. For example, the preconceived notion of the examiner may influence how they interpret the outcome. In addition, cultural differences affect people differently in the presence of stress or anxiety, which may result in incorrect conclusions.
H) Technological Advancements in Lie Detection:
Recent advancements aim to improve the accuracy of lie detection. Technologies such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and eye-tracking systems are being explored as alternatives. While promising, these methods are still in experimental stages and have not replaced traditional polygraphs.
I) Tips for Understanding Polygraph Results:
If you’re involved in a situation where a lie detector test is used, here are some key points to consider:
i) Understand the Purpose:
Know why the test is being conducted and how the results will be used.
ii) Be Honest:
Polygraphs might not be foolproof, but honesty is your best defense.
iii) Seek expert advice:
If the test results may seriously affect your life, consult a legal or psychological expert regarding your case.
J) Public Perception vs. Reality:
The public’s perception of lie detector test accuracy is often shaped by dramatized portrayals in media. Shows like “CSI” and “Lie to Me” depict polygraphs as definitive truth-telling devices, which is far from reality. This discrepancy underscores the importance of understanding their limitations.
K) Ethical Concerns Surrounding Polygraph Use:
The use of polygraphs is an ethical issue, especially when people feel forced to take them. Critics argue that the stress of being subjected to a lie detector test can itself lead to inaccurate results. Moreover, the potential misuse of polygraphs in employment or criminal justice contexts remains a topic of debate.
The Final Words:
The answer to whether you can trust a lie detector test lies in understanding its capabilities and limitations. Polygraphs may be useful in providing insights, but they are far from foolproof. Results depend on factors such as the examiner’s expertise, the subject’s state of mind, and the conditions under which the test is conducted.
Responsible and complementary use of polygraphs to other evidence may make them helpful, but solely for important decisions is risky. With myth buster techniques separating fact from fiction, it’s easier to choose when to apply the lie detector tests. More than that, a truth seeker would appreciate knowing more about the fine details of accuracy regarding lie detector tests.